<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: blowoutcongress.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chuck-thompson.com/2009/09/blowoutcongress-com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chuck-thompson.com/2009/09/blowoutcongress-com/</link>
	<description>a voice in the wilderness...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 10:31:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rebuildcongress.com</title>
		<link>http://chuck-thompson.com/2009/09/blowoutcongress-com/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>rebuildcongress.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuck-thompson.com/?p=388#comment-29</guid>
		<description>[...] few weeks ago I wrote an article critical of Jeff Bolton&#8217;s website blowoutcongress.com. The article appeared on a number of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="">
<p>[...] few weeks ago I wrote an article critical of Jeff Bolton&#8217;s website blowoutcongress.com. The article appeared on a number of [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://chuck-thompson.com/2009/09/blowoutcongress-com/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuck-thompson.com/?p=388#comment-25</guid>
		<description>&quot;If they&#039;re good then let them reapply for their position.&quot;  Do you mean in the election &lt;em&gt;after&lt;/em&gt; the one where you &quot;fire&quot; them?  Your comment makes no sense.  I am not familiar with the web site you&#039;ve cited.  I have written nothing against Jeff.  I like him.  I disagree with this idea of his and think there are better ways to accomplish what it is he is trying to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If they&#8217;re good then let them reapply for their position.&#8221;  Do you mean in the election <em>after</em> the one where you &#8220;fire&#8221; them?  Your comment makes no sense.  I am not familiar with the web site you&#8217;ve cited.  I have written nothing against Jeff.  I like him.  I disagree with this idea of his and think there are better ways to accomplish what it is he is trying to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BamBam</title>
		<link>http://chuck-thompson.com/2009/09/blowoutcongress-com/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>BamBam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuck-thompson.com/?p=388#comment-24</guid>
		<description>If they&#039;re good then let them reapply for their position. You dislike Charlie Rangel...well, maybe there are a few that like him....obviously he&#039;s been in since 1971. Just like how you state that you like your congressman. What Jeff has started is a great movement for us to try and take our country back. There&#039;s another movement called &lt;a href=&quot;http://goooh.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;goooh.com&lt;/a&gt; (Get Out of Our House) ...do you feel the same way about them or is it just that you&#039;re against Jeff and his &lt;a href=&quot;http://blowoutcongress.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blowoutcongress.com&lt;/a&gt; site????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they&#39;re good then let them reapply for their position. You dislike Charlie Rangel&#8230;well, maybe there are a few that like him&#8230;.obviously he&#39;s been in since 1971. Just like how you state that you like your congressman. What Jeff has started is a great movement for us to try and take our country back. There&#39;s another movement called <a href="http://goooh.com" rel="nofollow">goooh.com</a> (Get Out of Our House) &#8230;do you feel the same way about them or is it just that you&#39;re against Jeff and his <a href="http://blowoutcongress.com" rel="nofollow">blowoutcongress.com</a> site????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Thompson</title>
		<link>http://chuck-thompson.com/2009/09/blowoutcongress-com/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuck-thompson.com/?p=388#comment-23</guid>
		<description>&quot;Jeff isnt advocating just replacing the congressmen with any old soul that happens up to DC. We will replace them with people who are intelligent and not out for themselves.&quot;  I understand that.  If I thought it was otherwise, my article would have been much different.  And I agree that many congresspeople have been in office much too long and should be replaced.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My issue is about &quot;throwing the baby out with the bath water&quot;.  Surely you don&#039;t believe that there are absolutely no good congresspeople.  There must be at least a few.  Why do they have to get fired?  Why not focus on the radicals, corrupt, brain-dead ones instead of firing them all?  And, you really don&#039;t know that the replacements will be any better - they could be worse.  And, that doesn&#039;t even address committee appointments which are handed out based on seniority.  With Jeff&#039;s plan the replacements would be junior and might have replaced a good guy with committee experience.  We are at a critical juncture here - we&#039;re only a few steps away from socialism.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Its easy to get worked up and easier to advocate firing everyone, but it&#039;s not practical or, in my view, smart.  What is practical, is to focus on the bad ones.  Cast the light of truth on their misdeeds, expose them for the crooks they are and influence their departure.  My favorite choice today would be Charlie Rangel.  Apply the same exposure to his many misdeeds as has been applied to ACORN and his rat friends will bail on him.  If he didn&#039;t have the influence he has he wouldn&#039;t be able to get the earmarks he gets and without the earmarks he wouldn&#039;t be nearly as popular where he comes from - his constituents vote for him because, in effect, he buys their votes with earmarks.   Get it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Jeff isnt advocating just replacing the congressmen with any old soul that happens up to DC. We will replace them with people who are intelligent and not out for themselves.&#8221;  I understand that.  If I thought it was otherwise, my article would have been much different.  And I agree that many congresspeople have been in office much too long and should be replaced.</p>
<p>My issue is about &#8220;throwing the baby out with the bath water&#8221;.  Surely you don&#39;t believe that there are absolutely no good congresspeople.  There must be at least a few.  Why do they have to get fired?  Why not focus on the radicals, corrupt, brain-dead ones instead of firing them all?  And, you really don&#39;t know that the replacements will be any better &#8211; they could be worse.  And, that doesn&#39;t even address committee appointments which are handed out based on seniority.  With Jeff&#39;s plan the replacements would be junior and might have replaced a good guy with committee experience.  We are at a critical juncture here &#8211; we&#39;re only a few steps away from socialism.</p>
<p>Its easy to get worked up and easier to advocate firing everyone, but it&#39;s not practical or, in my view, smart.  What is practical, is to focus on the bad ones.  Cast the light of truth on their misdeeds, expose them for the crooks they are and influence their departure.  My favorite choice today would be Charlie Rangel.  Apply the same exposure to his many misdeeds as has been applied to ACORN and his rat friends will bail on him.  If he didn&#39;t have the influence he has he wouldn&#39;t be able to get the earmarks he gets and without the earmarks he wouldn&#39;t be nearly as popular where he comes from &#8211; his constituents vote for him because, in effect, he buys their votes with earmarks.   Get it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane M</title>
		<link>http://chuck-thompson.com/2009/09/blowoutcongress-com/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuck-thompson.com/?p=388#comment-21</guid>
		<description>You keep pointing to Obama being a symptom of people voting on an &quot;anything would be better approach.&quot; I say we got Obama simply because the general public are foolish, generally uneducated (politically speaking) sheep. I voted based on who I thought would best uphold our Constitutional Republic based on my independent research, and he was neither a democrat nor republican. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Only a few of the people I have spoken to indicated that they voted based on your emotional premise. Most of the people I have talked with voted based on their ignorance and lack of knowledge of the system and the person for whom they voted. Most people believe that the mainstream media tells the truth and is not agenda driven, which is far from the actual truth of the matter. When the majority of people allow themselves to be led like sheep by the controlled mainstream media, we get presidents such as Obama and Bush.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Change comes from the education of people. Jeff is making the attempt to educate the people in opposition to the controlled mainstream media sources. Yes, let&#039;s vote out all of the incumbents and send the message that we will not tolerate their tyrannical policies. Let&#039;s also stray from the democrat/republican two headed serpent system and vote in independent and third party candidates. Then lets blow them out when they screw the pooch, until We the People send a clear message to our public servants - Don&#039;t Tread on Me!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hold no hope that congress will get blown out. There are too many Americans that are just to comfortable to care about the country they live in, the freedoms they are giving up, and the political system they refuse to take and active roll in. America will soon fall with a whimper and applause into a full blow oligarchy, and when it is too late to do anything about it, people will finally be asking the questions they should have been asking 108 years ago when the first progressive socialists took office in this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You keep pointing to Obama being a symptom of people voting on an &#8220;anything would be better approach.&#8221; I say we got Obama simply because the general public are foolish, generally uneducated (politically speaking) sheep. I voted based on who I thought would best uphold our Constitutional Republic based on my independent research, and he was neither a democrat nor republican. </p>
<p>Only a few of the people I have spoken to indicated that they voted based on your emotional premise. Most of the people I have talked with voted based on their ignorance and lack of knowledge of the system and the person for whom they voted. Most people believe that the mainstream media tells the truth and is not agenda driven, which is far from the actual truth of the matter. When the majority of people allow themselves to be led like sheep by the controlled mainstream media, we get presidents such as Obama and Bush.</p>
<p>Change comes from the education of people. Jeff is making the attempt to educate the people in opposition to the controlled mainstream media sources. Yes, let&#39;s vote out all of the incumbents and send the message that we will not tolerate their tyrannical policies. Let&#39;s also stray from the democrat/republican two headed serpent system and vote in independent and third party candidates. Then lets blow them out when they screw the pooch, until We the People send a clear message to our public servants &#8211; Don&#39;t Tread on Me!</p>
<p>I hold no hope that congress will get blown out. There are too many Americans that are just to comfortable to care about the country they live in, the freedoms they are giving up, and the political system they refuse to take and active roll in. America will soon fall with a whimper and applause into a full blow oligarchy, and when it is too late to do anything about it, people will finally be asking the questions they should have been asking 108 years ago when the first progressive socialists took office in this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol Peacock</title>
		<link>http://chuck-thompson.com/2009/09/blowoutcongress-com/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol Peacock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuck-thompson.com/?p=388#comment-22</guid>
		<description>I understand your concern, but Jeff isnt advocating just replacing the congressmen with any old soul that happens up to DC. We will replace them with people who are intelligent and not out for themselves.  And if we get hoodwinked again, we will vote that one out too. But keeping the same old people there just because you recognize the name on the ballot is bad politics and is what has led to some reps and senators being there 40 years.  Also, we know they have a staggered election cycle so ony about a third are replaced at a time. Only a few of them will be there who look like a calf looking at a new gate. You underestimate the American people. there are plenty of qualified people who would get in there and stop the frickin pork and tax hikes etc.  It&#039;s not rocket science... and now Jeff has started a new website about improving congress, I dont remember the name right now, but its focus is to build up congress.  Maybe that is the name...oh well.  As for Jeff running for office, you are probably right, he should step down from KLIF if he is campaigning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand your concern, but Jeff isnt advocating just replacing the congressmen with any old soul that happens up to DC. We will replace them with people who are intelligent and not out for themselves.  And if we get hoodwinked again, we will vote that one out too. But keeping the same old people there just because you recognize the name on the ballot is bad politics and is what has led to some reps and senators being there 40 years.  Also, we know they have a staggered election cycle so ony about a third are replaced at a time. Only a few of them will be there who look like a calf looking at a new gate. You underestimate the American people. there are plenty of qualified people who would get in there and stop the frickin pork and tax hikes etc.  It&#39;s not rocket science&#8230; and now Jeff has started a new website about improving congress, I dont remember the name right now, but its focus is to build up congress.  Maybe that is the name&#8230;oh well.  As for Jeff running for office, you are probably right, he should step down from KLIF if he is campaigning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Thompson</title>
		<link>http://chuck-thompson.com/2009/09/blowoutcongress-com/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuck-thompson.com/?p=388#comment-20</guid>
		<description>I agree that our leadership is foundering, corrupt and self-serving as a whole.   &quot;shake up the system and return power to the voters&quot;.  The power is already in the hands of the voters.  The voters elected those in congress now.  The problem is the voters wanted change for the sake of change with no consideration for ability, honesty, etc.  And it is that very &quot;change for the sake of change&quot; approach in Jeff&#039;s plan which I dispute.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Start a &lt;a href=&quot;http://blowoutradicals.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blowoutradicals.com&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://blowoutrsocialists.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blowoutradicals.com&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://blowoutliberals.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blowoutliberals.com&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://blowoutthieves.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blowoutthieves.com&lt;/a&gt; and I&#039;ll be all over it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that our leadership is foundering, corrupt and self-serving as a whole.   &#8220;shake up the system and return power to the voters&#8221;.  The power is already in the hands of the voters.  The voters elected those in congress now.  The problem is the voters wanted change for the sake of change with no consideration for ability, honesty, etc.  And it is that very &#8220;change for the sake of change&#8221; approach in Jeff&#39;s plan which I dispute.</p>
<p>Start a <a href="http://blowoutradicals.com" rel="nofollow">blowoutradicals.com</a> or <a href="http://blowoutrsocialists.com" rel="nofollow">blowoutradicals.com</a> or <a href="http://blowoutliberals.com" rel="nofollow">blowoutliberals.com</a> or <a href="http://blowoutthieves.com" rel="nofollow">blowoutthieves.com</a> and I&#39;ll be all over it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://chuck-thompson.com/2009/09/blowoutcongress-com/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuck-thompson.com/?p=388#comment-19</guid>
		<description>I think the point is that both parties have turned in terribly wrong directions. To put an end to that you cannot support one party over the other by voting for incumbents. The only way to shake up the system and return power to the voters is to vote everybody out. A large majority of American people think that Congress is doing a poor job yet most of them think their own Congressperson is okay. How can that be? Wake up and realize that the reason Congress is messed up is because the members of Congress are messed up, even your own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the point is that both parties have turned in terribly wrong directions. To put an end to that you cannot support one party over the other by voting for incumbents. The only way to shake up the system and return power to the voters is to vote everybody out. A large majority of American people think that Congress is doing a poor job yet most of them think their own Congressperson is okay. How can that be? Wake up and realize that the reason Congress is messed up is because the members of Congress are messed up, even your own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Thompson</title>
		<link>http://chuck-thompson.com/2009/09/blowoutcongress-com/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuck-thompson.com/?p=388#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your comments.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The following is quoted directly from &lt;a href=&quot;http://blowoutcongress.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blowoutcongress.com&lt;/a&gt; &quot;BlowOutCongress.com advocates the complete replacement of all 535 members of congress in the next election cycles. &quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now I don&#039;t know how that could be more clear.  And what it means to me is Obama-style change.  Change because we&#039;re not happy.  But Obama is living proof that just changing is not enough.  It has to be change for the better.  Blowing out congress in its entirely sounds good - IF we KNEW the replacements would be better than the incumbents.  But they haven&#039;t even announced yet so we don&#039;t know if they&#039;d be better.  And that&#039;s the rub.  Obama was elected because people thought anyone would be better than a Republican.  But they were clearly wrong.  They elected a socialist based upon the &quot;anything would be better&quot; approach.  And what Jeff is promoting is essentially an &quot;anything would be better&quot; approach.  That is my entire problem with it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;That being said, I find it understandable that Jeff Bolton may not choose to have you on his radio show to talk about &lt;a href=&quot;http://BlowoutCongress.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;BlowoutCongress.com&lt;/a&gt; considering that all appearances point to you not advocating a congressional change.&quot;  Just for the record, I&#039;ve never called the show about blowoutcongress - my comments were in relation to other topics about which I&#039;ve called.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;all appearances point to you not advocating a congressional change.&quot;.  I advocate change when it is called for.  I happen to like my congressman and don&#039;t want to see him changed just because Jeff thinks ALL of congress should be blown out .  That sort of thinking is what got us Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your comments.</p>
<p>The following is quoted directly from <a href="http://blowoutcongress.com" rel="nofollow">blowoutcongress.com</a> &#8220;BlowOutCongress.com advocates the complete replacement of all 535 members of congress in the next election cycles. &#8220;</p>
<p>Now I don&#39;t know how that could be more clear.  And what it means to me is Obama-style change.  Change because we&#39;re not happy.  But Obama is living proof that just changing is not enough.  It has to be change for the better.  Blowing out congress in its entirely sounds good &#8211; IF we KNEW the replacements would be better than the incumbents.  But they haven&#39;t even announced yet so we don&#39;t know if they&#39;d be better.  And that&#39;s the rub.  Obama was elected because people thought anyone would be better than a Republican.  But they were clearly wrong.  They elected a socialist based upon the &#8220;anything would be better&#8221; approach.  And what Jeff is promoting is essentially an &#8220;anything would be better&#8221; approach.  That is my entire problem with it.</p>
<p>&#8220;That being said, I find it understandable that Jeff Bolton may not choose to have you on his radio show to talk about <a href="http://BlowoutCongress.com" rel="nofollow">BlowoutCongress.com</a> considering that all appearances point to you not advocating a congressional change.&#8221;  Just for the record, I&#39;ve never called the show about blowoutcongress &#8211; my comments were in relation to other topics about which I&#39;ve called.</p>
<p>&#8220;all appearances point to you not advocating a congressional change.&#8221;.  I advocate change when it is called for.  I happen to like my congressman and don&#39;t want to see him changed just because Jeff thinks ALL of congress should be blown out .  That sort of thinking is what got us Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane M</title>
		<link>http://chuck-thompson.com/2009/09/blowoutcongress-com/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuck-thompson.com/?p=388#comment-17</guid>
		<description>I do not think that Jeff Bolton is promoting an &quot;anything but this&quot; strategy through &lt;a href=&quot;http://BlowoutCongress.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;BlowoutCongress.com&lt;/a&gt;. I listen to his show most days since he started at KLIF, and am familiar with his approach to things, and have heard of &lt;a href=&quot;http://BlowoutCongress.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;BlowoutCongress.com&lt;/a&gt; since its inception, I am of the opinion that his intention is to wake up Americans to the status quo of congress and its incumbents. He wants to energize the population into thoughtful action, in hopes that they will inform themselves about their incumbent as well as candidates running against them, and make a well considered vote against the status quo, especially when confronted with the poor representation delivered by such an incumbent.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I cannot imagine that people actually believe that the congressional incumbents are doing a good job. Even the slanted polls suggest that this country is disgusted with congress with 30% and lower approval ratings. The fact is that our politicians are ruining the democratic Republic that our forefathers spilled blood to create. What remains to be seen is if the American people will actually get involved, allow third party candidates an opportunity, and question every statement and answer that our current and running politicians make in order to justifiably kick out the rotten congressional incumbents.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That being said, I find it understandable that Jeff Bolton may not choose to have you on his radio show to talk about &lt;a href=&quot;http://BlowoutCongress.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;BlowoutCongress.com&lt;/a&gt; considering that all appearances point to you not advocating a congressional change. You can plainly see that fear controls congressional members. They change parties just to keep their job; they change votes just to keep their job; they know that they are screwing up, and Jeff is trying to push them out, yet you think this is a bad idea. Your post sounds like a protectionist political speech to me. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for Jeff possibly running for office, this has nothing to do with &lt;a href=&quot;http://BlowoutCongress.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;BlowoutCongress.com&lt;/a&gt;, but has everything to do with him using common sense when discussing most topics. People are attracted to common sense. People want to get behind common sense. &lt;a href=&quot;http://BlowoutCongress.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;BlowoutCongress.com&lt;/a&gt; is common sense when you take the data from the polls, the data from recent and past town halls, an the simple fact that congress has been overstepping their authority for years with no backlash from We the People of these United States. Personally, I only agree with about half of what Jeff&#039;s policies would be if he were to become a congressman. I would personally have difficulty voting for him over someone else that may be running for the position, but would easily vote for him over the incumbent.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for the &quot;up against a commercial break,&quot; and being on hold for 20+ minutes, I have to agree with you. The policies of KLIF, and the incessant 7-8 minute commercial breaks are considerably annoying. It is one of the reasons why I no longer listen to the program on a daily basis. Jeff also has a bad tendency of dominating the conversation from time-to-time, which is also annoying.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regardless of how anyone feels about this topic, your views, or mine, I still stand firm that this country needs better leaders in all branches of the federal government. We need men and women who stand for liberty, and will not be bullied into signing bills they do not agree with, will not stand for 11th hour amendments slipped in under the cover of darkness, will not tolerate out of control spending, will not be swayed by money, fame, or lobbyists to sell out this country for little temporary safety, and will limit themselves as set forth in the Constitution which protects the people from government intrusion into our lives and liberties.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To our currently serving congressmen I leave this quote: &quot;If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.&quot; - Samuel Adams&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To those who may wish to replace them and serve The People, I leave this: &quot;Against us are... all timid men who prefer the calm of despotism to the boisterous sea of liberty... We are likely to preserve the liberty we have obtained only by unremitting labors and perils.&quot; -Thomas Jefferson&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;For those looking for security, be forewarned that there&#039;s nothing more insecure than a political promise.&quot; - Harry Browne</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not think that Jeff Bolton is promoting an &#8220;anything but this&#8221; strategy through <a href="http://BlowoutCongress.com" rel="nofollow">BlowoutCongress.com</a>. I listen to his show most days since he started at KLIF, and am familiar with his approach to things, and have heard of <a href="http://BlowoutCongress.com" rel="nofollow">BlowoutCongress.com</a> since its inception, I am of the opinion that his intention is to wake up Americans to the status quo of congress and its incumbents. He wants to energize the population into thoughtful action, in hopes that they will inform themselves about their incumbent as well as candidates running against them, and make a well considered vote against the status quo, especially when confronted with the poor representation delivered by such an incumbent.</p>
<p>I cannot imagine that people actually believe that the congressional incumbents are doing a good job. Even the slanted polls suggest that this country is disgusted with congress with 30% and lower approval ratings. The fact is that our politicians are ruining the democratic Republic that our forefathers spilled blood to create. What remains to be seen is if the American people will actually get involved, allow third party candidates an opportunity, and question every statement and answer that our current and running politicians make in order to justifiably kick out the rotten congressional incumbents.</p>
<p>That being said, I find it understandable that Jeff Bolton may not choose to have you on his radio show to talk about <a href="http://BlowoutCongress.com" rel="nofollow">BlowoutCongress.com</a> considering that all appearances point to you not advocating a congressional change. You can plainly see that fear controls congressional members. They change parties just to keep their job; they change votes just to keep their job; they know that they are screwing up, and Jeff is trying to push them out, yet you think this is a bad idea. Your post sounds like a protectionist political speech to me. </p>
<p>As for Jeff possibly running for office, this has nothing to do with <a href="http://BlowoutCongress.com" rel="nofollow">BlowoutCongress.com</a>, but has everything to do with him using common sense when discussing most topics. People are attracted to common sense. People want to get behind common sense. <a href="http://BlowoutCongress.com" rel="nofollow">BlowoutCongress.com</a> is common sense when you take the data from the polls, the data from recent and past town halls, an the simple fact that congress has been overstepping their authority for years with no backlash from We the People of these United States. Personally, I only agree with about half of what Jeff&#39;s policies would be if he were to become a congressman. I would personally have difficulty voting for him over someone else that may be running for the position, but would easily vote for him over the incumbent.</p>
<p>As for the &#8220;up against a commercial break,&#8221; and being on hold for 20+ minutes, I have to agree with you. The policies of KLIF, and the incessant 7-8 minute commercial breaks are considerably annoying. It is one of the reasons why I no longer listen to the program on a daily basis. Jeff also has a bad tendency of dominating the conversation from time-to-time, which is also annoying.</p>
<p>Regardless of how anyone feels about this topic, your views, or mine, I still stand firm that this country needs better leaders in all branches of the federal government. We need men and women who stand for liberty, and will not be bullied into signing bills they do not agree with, will not stand for 11th hour amendments slipped in under the cover of darkness, will not tolerate out of control spending, will not be swayed by money, fame, or lobbyists to sell out this country for little temporary safety, and will limit themselves as set forth in the Constitution which protects the people from government intrusion into our lives and liberties.</p>
<p>To our currently serving congressmen I leave this quote: &#8220;If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.&#8221; &#8211; Samuel Adams</p>
<p>To those who may wish to replace them and serve The People, I leave this: &#8220;Against us are&#8230; all timid men who prefer the calm of despotism to the boisterous sea of liberty&#8230; We are likely to preserve the liberty we have obtained only by unremitting labors and perils.&#8221; -Thomas Jefferson</p>
<p>&#8220;For those looking for security, be forewarned that there&#39;s nothing more insecure than a political promise.&#8221; &#8211; Harry Browne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

