<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chuck Thompson &#187; morality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chuck-thompson.com/tag/morality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chuck-thompson.com</link>
	<description>a voice in the wilderness...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 10:56:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>shi&#8217;a views on interrogation of prisoners</title>
		<link>http://chuck-thompson.com/2009/09/shia-views-on-interrogation-of-prisoners/</link>
		<comments>http://chuck-thompson.com/2009/09/shia-views-on-interrogation-of-prisoners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 12:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ramblings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ahmajinedad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interrogation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interrogator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[islamist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesbah-Yazdi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radical islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radical islamist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rape]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuck-thompson.com/?p=144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While we question the morality of blowing smoke in the faces of terrorists our political masters are on a witch hunt for the smoke-blowers. Contrast that to the clarity of the Iranian leadership. They are quite clear on what is acceptable or scriptural regarding the torture of prisoners. &#8220;Can an interrogator rape the prisoner in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While we question the morality of blowing smoke in the faces of terrorists our political masters are on a witch hunt for the smoke-blowers.  Contrast that to the clarity of the Iranian leadership. They are quite clear on what is acceptable or scriptural regarding the torture of prisoners.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Can an interrogator rape the prisoner in order to obtain a confession?&#8221; was the follow-up question posed to the Islamic cleric.<br />
Mesbah-Yazdi answered: &#8220;The necessary precaution is for the interrogator to perform a ritual washing first and say prayers while raping the prisoner. If the prisoner is female, it is permissible to rape through the vagina or anus. It is better not to have a witness present. If it is a male prisoner, then it&#8217;s acceptable for someone else to watch while the rape is committed.&#8221;  <a href="http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/133214">Read it the whole article&#8230;</a></p></blockquote>
<p><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-146" title="imam" src="http://chuck-thompson.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/imam-150x150.jpg" alt="imam" width="150" height="150" />See &#8211; no ambiguity there.  They have standards for interrogation of prisoners.  We, on the other hand, are about to begin a pogrom targeting CIA officers who were following legal orders.  The message it sends is quite clear to Islamists.  The message our enemies get from our President is that we are weak, stupid and politically motivated.  We turn on our own.  They, on the other hand, hold the moral high ground &#8211; in the opinions of their imams and their president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chuck-thompson.com/2009/09/shia-views-on-interrogation-of-prisoners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>better, cheaper or faster</title>
		<link>http://chuck-thompson.com/2009/08/better-cheaper-or-faster/</link>
		<comments>http://chuck-thompson.com/2009/08/better-cheaper-or-faster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[doublespeak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bureaucracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobbyist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobbyists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-serving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special-interest group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Post Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuck-thompson.com/?p=76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why does anyone, or any business hire a contractor to do anything instead of doing it themselves?  Pretty simple, they believe the contractor can do it better, cheaper, faster or its self-serving.  It really is that simple &#8211; better, cheaper, faster or self-serving.  Think about it in your own life or business and you&#8217;ll have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does anyone, or any business hire a contractor to do anything instead of doing it themselves?  Pretty simple, they believe the contractor can do it better, cheaper, faster or its <a href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/self-serving" target="_blank">self-serving</a>.  It really is that simple &#8211; better, cheaper, faster or self-serving.  Think about it in your own life or business and you&#8217;ll have to agree that every factor in the outside contractor decision-making-process  falls into one or more of those categories.</p>
<p>Morally, the self-serving factor should be considered when the decision affects only you.  In othe words, if you represent others (publically-held corporation, government entity, non-profit organization, etc.) the self-serving factor should not be allowed to come into play.</p>
<p>Why, in the face of continuing and mounting losses (offset to some degree by continuing and mounting price increases),  is the United States Post Office not offering email distribution for the various federal, state and local governments?  Logic tells me it is not better, cheaper and faster.  So why hassn&#8217;t government created their own service for email to replace the <a href="http://www.govdelivery.com/index.php" target="_blank">independent contractor</a> they currently use?  Well, I suspect they think the timely and successful delivery of their email is too important to them to put it into the hands of a government bureaucracy.</p>
<p>Yet, they are anxious to run healthcare.  Yours, not theirs.  Can government-run healthcare be proven to be better, cheaper or faster?  Of course not.  The only way to do that would be to try it for a while and examine the results.  Given the historically poor track record of bureaucracy, self-serving politicians, special interest groups and lobbyists a national health care system is doomed to fail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chuck-thompson.com/2009/08/better-cheaper-or-faster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

